Chemical Evolution Impossibilities

1. Scientists go to great extremes in well-equipped laboratories with complex instruments, gauges, apparatus, chemicals, and mechanisms costing hundreds of thousands of dollars.  They use high temperatures, special solutions, sparking devices, and glass traps.  They do not go down to the seashore and start sloshing around in seawater in the hope of producing amino acids.  Because they are intelligent and highly trained, they know to do it in million-dollar laboratories, fitted out with expensive equipment and lots of purified chemicals.  Yet, according to evolutionary theory, seawater somehow did it by itself.

2. Water would have dissolved any chemical that would have formed.  The Law of Mass Action would immediately neutralize the procedure and ruin the outcome.  This is because chemical reactions always proceed in a direction from highest to lowest concentration (assuming that the exact amount of energy is even present to perform that reaction).

3. The necessary water for life to exist inhibits the growth of necessary complex molecules by dissipating any energy that might have a chance at activating any further chemical reactions.  Scientists know that there had to be some form of energy to work the chemical transformations.  They generally think it would have had to be a bolt of lightning, since there were no wall outlets back in the beginning to plug electrical cords into.  But anything struck by lightning is not enlivened, but killed!

4. With oxygen in the air, the first amino acid to begin life would never have gotten started; without oxygen, it would have been wiped out by cosmic rays.  Evolutionists are locked into a situation here that they cannot escape from.  Spontaneous generation could ot occur with oxygen-or without it!

5. The delicate electrical energy required to initiate the beginning of life would have had to come from lighting; which would have killed anything that could possibly have emulated a beginning to life.  And the concentration of the individual and combined variety of chemicals involved with the smallest molecule of life is impossible, let alone non-probable in any form, atmosphere, or matter available in the environment.

There is more to a living organism than merely chemical compounds, proteins, and fatty acids.  There are also enzymes, which scientists in laboratories do not know how to produce.  Yet there are thousands of complicated, very different enzymes in a typical animal.

There are slo massive DNA and other coding problems.  Has any scientist ever synthesized even one new animal code?  No, he would have no idea how to accomplish the task successfully.  The emphasis here is on “successful.”  If he could interject a new code, it would only damage the organism.  Scientists are now able to slightly adapt existing codes (genetic engineering); but they do not invent brand new ones.  The list of necessities goes on and on.

What about life itself?  One minute after it dies, an animal still has all its chemicals, proteins, fatty acids, enzymes, codes, and all the rest.  But it no longer has life.  Scientists cannot produce life; why then why should they expect rocks and seawater to have that ability?

WHAT WAS LOST

So, what does it mean when there is more evidence of creation by intelligent design than evolution by random chance?  It means that the designer and creator of existence is beyond space, matter, and time.  The Christian Bible is the only complete direction of faith that places God in such a position and has expressed details of creation undiscovered until thousands of years after they were written.

Maybe the reason so many people have been resistant to Christianity is because it has tended to be exclusive, even when trying to invite newcomers in.  Humanity was created to think outside the box and care for each other as we should want to care for ourselves.

The greatest loss to humanity by not acknowledging the Central Source and Focus of Existence, otherwise known as God, is our availability to variety and diversity.  God created humanity to grow and expand and we have deteriorated and reduced God in our existence instead.  Get to know Jesus and increase God in your life.

Unidiversal is all about reaching every person of all diversity with faith in Jesus Christ.  Unidiversal Christian Faith is not religious or denominational; it is a clear search for the ever-searchable and non-condemning Savior of every human being.

  John 3:16-17 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.  For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

There is plenty of currently observable evidence that does not depend on any unobservable theories.  Intelligent design of creation is evident far above and beyond evolution.  Disproving evolution by identifying things that can not be proven is not proof.  But, theories about creation are proven by detailed and observable evidence of intelligent design.

There are six (6) types of evolution necessary for evolution to be true:

1. Cosmic evolution – the origin of time, space and matter; a Big Bang.

2. Chemical evolution – the origin of higher elements from hydrogen.

3. Stellar and planetary evolution – origin of stars and plants.

4. Organic evolution – origin of life.  Spontaneous.

5. Macroevolution – changing from one kind of animal into another.

6. Microevolution – variations within kinds.  This is the only one that has been observed and therefore qualifies as science, and it does not contradict the Bible.  Just because this kind is provable does not make all kinds true.  (Also see the pamphlet about microevolution to see if it is really evolution at all.)

Chemical

C H A R I S M A T I C   C H R I S T I A N   F A I T H

&   D I V E R S I T Y   E V A N G E L I S M

U N I F I E D   U N I V E R S A L   D I V E R S I T Y

Creation Trilogy Revival Series

This page was last updated on: May 7, 2008

TOP

Stalactites & stalagmites have been believed to form over very long periods of time.  Evolutionists use these lengthy periods to prove evolutionary theory.  But it's proven that it doesn't have to take lengthy periods of time to form such structures.